Skip to content

French Roast

March 4, 2010:  French Roast

French Roast is an 8-minute animated short film from France, nominated for the 2009 Oscar for Best Animated Short Film.  A man sits in a French cafe and orders a coffee, but then can’t find his wallet, so he stays and continues ordering coffees while he tries to figure out what to do about his problems.

It just gets worse and worse.  Now all hopped up on caffeine, the man has repeated episodes with a homeless man begging for change, an old woman sitting next to him in the cafe, and the patient but increasingly suspicious waiter who senses that something may be amiss.  Rest assured that things all work out somehow in the end, after several MINUTES of suspense.

The exaggerated faces and postures and hairstyles are delightful, and part of the reason why I tend to like animated short films.  They can create their own original aesthetic and self-contained world, and don’t need to stay beyond their welcome.  French roast is a slight, but perfectly serviceable animated short film and I can understand why it got an Oscar nomination.

Quick review for a quick film.

Instead of Abracadabra

March 1, 2010:  Instead of Abracadabra

Instead of Abracadabra is a live-action short film from Sweden, running 22 minutes.  It was nominated for an Oscar for 2009, but did not win.  After a disorienting opening, during which a man stands in his house looking out the window at a mother and son moving in next door, the man is established as an unemployed son still living with his parents well into his twenties, trying to follow his passion and become a magician.  His Dad wants him to get a real job, particularly after the son tests out a magic trick with his mother involving her getting in a box and him sticking swords into it, which results in a hospital trip for her.

Ah, but the cute new neighbour lady works at the hospital, which leads to a chance meeting and a gig at her son’s birthday party, after which she agrees to then attend another show at the magician’s father’s birthday party.  Apparent disaster turns out to be part of the trick, and our hapless magician’s world is turning around.  When performing his tricks, “Chimay” is the word he uses instead of abracadabra, hence the film’s title.

This is a delightfully goofy little film, with quiet emotional moments as well as completely off-the-wall theatrics.  It was my choice for the Oscar for best live-action short film, but did not win.

Give this 22 minutes, if possible.

The Door

March 1, 2010:  The Door

The Door, an Oscar-nominated live-action short film from Ireland running 17 minutes, opens with a man on a motorcycle approaching an abandoned fairground, with military guys chasing him through this otherwise deserted landscape.  He steals a door from a house, strapping it to his motorcycle and riding away.

What’s this all about?  The viewer’s confusion at the start is obviously intentional, as the next sequence helps us to understand but still doesn’t quite spell it out.  The man, obviously some time earlier, is packing up with his wife and daughter to leave their home admid the sound of sirens in a forced evacuation, with the man repeatedly telling his daughter that they are not allowed to take anything with them.  Somewhere around this point it became clear to me that the issue was radiation, and I guessed (from the language and decor) that this was Chernobyl, which indeed it was.

When after a short time away the daughter dies from radiation exposure, the man wants to uphold their cultural tradition and lay her out on a door (the man’s father had the same treatment on the very same door years ago).  This leaves him with no choice but to go into the contaminated and evacuated area to retrieve the front door of his house in order to give his daughter a proper burial.  He was forced to steal the door from his own house.

In a voiceover, the man expresses that “that day we didn’t just lose a town, we lost our whole world”.  Never for a moment do we doubt that he will always live with this painful truth.

It’s based on a true story.

Miracle Fish

March 1, 2010:  Miracle Fish

Unfortunately, Miracle Fish has been deteriorating in my memory since I saw it, which is a shame since at the time, aside from a few points, I thought it was pretty good.

Miracle Fish is an Australian live-action short-film Oscar nominee for 2009, running about 17 minutes.  Walking a fine line between clarifying itself as either real or a dream, it starts out innocently enough with a mother dropping off her son at school, but quickly veers into mystical territory as the boy wakes from a nap in the nurse’s office and finds the school deserted.

Despite initially thinking that alien abduction is to blame, after quite some time during which he enjoys some fun and games in the empty halls, the boy eventually learns that the school is deserted because there’s a crazy gunman running loose.  Using the titular cheap plastic cellophane “miracle” fish the boy had received earlier that day from his mother as a birthday gift, he accurately predicts the demise of the gunman, in a climax which will scar the boy for life, and possibly some viewers as well.

The film is generally very quiet, which is a gutsy technique in general but can be more easily made to work in short film territory.  Perhaps it was the slow start, or the lack of clarity around what the film was about, which left me cold.  However, there’s still plenty to experience here, and the Oscar nomination was well deserved.

Strange mix of magic and reality.

The New Tenants

March 1, 2010:  The New Tenants

The second of the Oscar-nominated live-action short films for 2009 that I saw, The New Tenants is the one with the most star power on hand, and ultimately was the one to win the award.  I was surprised to see it win, since I figured that sombre films representing real human pain and suffering tend to win these awards, rather than comedic gangster-type movies with fictional human pain and suffering.  I’m perfectly happy with The New Tenants winning.  It is from Denmark, but could be easily mistaken for American.  It runs about 20 minutes.

We start off at a leisurely pace with two men sitting in their newly rented apartment and bickering about life and death, and the particulars of how they ended up in this new apartment.  Within a short time they have become acquainted with a number of their new neighbours, including a nice old lady who wants to borrow a cup of flour to make some cinnamon buns for her granddaughter, an angry husband looking for his wife, and a drug-dealing acquaintance of the former tenant.  All of these characters and more converge on the apartment in a Tarantino-esque climax of brutal violence, and the new tenants do the only thing they can do – puzzle at the situation and then start dancing.  Roll the recipe for the cinnamon buns the old lady was making instead of the end credits (don’t worry, the real credits follow), and the film’s quirkiness cred is sealed.

Confounding, funny, tragic, all at once.

Kavi

March 1, 2010:  Kavi

For the first time, my local movie theatres were showing all of the Oscar nominated short films before the Oscar show.  They packaged up all of the live-action shorts on one night, and the animated ones on another night, in the week leading up to March 7.  This was of course a mixed blessing since it would mean 10 more reviews I’d have to write, but I’ve long been fascinated by these categories and have only rarely managed to see one or two of the nominated shorts, typically one of the animated ones tacked onto the start of a Disney or Pixar film.  So for approximately the next 10 reviews, I will experiment with reviewing styles for short films, determining whether they really deserve only a paragraph or two each, or if they need to be more complex than that.  I’ve decided that for the most part, it’s OK to spoil the films since most readers will not be seeing them and will get more out of the reviews if they know more about the story.

Kavi is a live-action short from India, running about 19 minutes.  Kavi is a child worker in India, manufacturing mud bricks, and at first we see a boss treating him like one of his prized employees and a very fast worker.  It quickly becomes known that Kavi’s father owes money to the brickmaker, making him effectively a modern-day slave who is forced to work off his debt.  Kavi is also made to work and his father can do nothing about it, and although the boss is typically pleasant with Kavi, there is ferocious punishment if he gets out of line, for example falling behind in his work or leaving the compound.  During one such departure, Kavi encounters a couple of well-dressed but seemingly suspicious guys in the nearby woods who offer him a drink.  He reluctantly accepts, and gets in trouble upon his return.

Kavi wants to go to school, and to play cricket.  These seem like modest and achievable goals.  If only he knew.

Eventually, social workers raid the brick “factory”, and they turn out to be the same guys Kavi encountered in the woods.  The boss, anticipating this, has already sent away most of the slaves to hide them somewhere, and Kavi remains the only one, locked up inside a hut.  When he escapes, he is given the choice to go with the social workers, under the boss’ threat that he’ll never see his parents again.  Kavi makes his choice.

At the close of the film, we are reminded that 27 million people live in modern-day slavery.  This is a heartbreaking statistic, and the film illustrates all too well how easy it is for this to happen in areas of the world which don’t have strong civil rights and anti-corruption laws and culture in place.  Kavi achieves its goal of personalizing the pain, and needs fewer than 20 minutes to do so.

Lots of pain in little time.

Burma VJ

February 28, 2010:  Burma VJ

Burma VJ made me feel like a bad person.  Here we have groundbreaking video footage smuggled out of Burma, depicting the mistreatment of monks during a protest in 2007, in a place where journalism is actually illegal.  The world is seeing for the first time a crack in the armour of the government’s oppressive regime.  And yet I felt strangely unmoved.  Maybe it’s because I wasn’t in the mood, or it was late at night, or I’m desensitized to the cruelty in the world and how everyone can just turn their heads and ignore violence and human rights violations.  But it somehow didn’t click.

How can such basic rights violations and closed societies still exist today?  Well, they do.  I need to credit Burma VJ with opening my eyes to this.  Nominated for an Oscar as the best documentary feature, it did not win the award.  I don’t even have much more to say about the film.  I would not recommend against it, but I’m also not suggesting that anyone rush out to see it.

My heartlessness makes some documentaries unmoving.

Un Prophète

February 28, 2010:  Un Prophète

I feel like I want to say so much about Un Prophète, and yet I know that I shouldn’t.  This Cannes grand jury prize winner from last year is a complex and violent 2.5-hour tale which never lets up for a minute through its run time, brilliantly depicting a young man’s journey through the gangster underworld of France.

Starting out in prison as he commences a 6-year sentence, Malik is clearly vulnerable and lost.  Quickly taken in by the Corsican contingent despite his arab roots, Malik diligently works for them doing menial jobs, and proves his allegiance through a brutal and fitfully planned murder of one of the other inmates, whose ghost continues to haunt and advise him through the rest of the film.  Malik grows to be trusted by the Corsican ringleader, moreso after several of the Corsican gang are released unexpectedly due to political wrangling in the outside world, leaving the boss with a decidedly smaller entourage.  Malik continues to deliberately appear dumb and out of the loop, when in reality almost everyone he talks to provides additional information or opportunities, and he quickly progresses to a position of significant underworld power both inside and outside the prison.

There’s violence where there needs to be violence, but this is much more about the mind games and the risky but sometimes rewarding strategies chosen by each individual.  Malik has a compelling and charismatic personality, and is clearly very smart, and it’s unfortunate that he had to go to prison in order to live up to his potential.  He is an almost uncanny judge of character, which is what earns him the prophet nickname, but I felt that this near-mystical element was underplayed and didn’t quite fit in the grounded story.

Un Prophète is a relentless experience, and absolutely justified as France’s entry for Oscar consideration in the foreign-language film category, in which it was nominated but did not win, although it was my top choice.  I won’t spoil any more of the story for anyone up for a viewing of this rewarding film.

Tough but also intelligent crime drama.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

February 27, 2010:  Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

It’s a good thing that the lengths of my movie reviews don’t need to correspond with the run times of their subjects.  The Harry Potter films all tend to be lengthy, in the 2.5-hour range, but I find less and less to think or write about with each installment.  Admittedly that’s largely my fault, since I only read the first Harry Potter book.  I found it to be a refreshingly written children’s novel, but not a series I needed to continue with in light of all the other authors I haven’t read at all.  Sure, I waste lots of time watching movies, but even there I remain conscious of the dubiousness of having seen Tommy Boy (1995) countless times yet never having seen Alfred Hitchcock’s North by Northwest (1959).

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is based on the sixth book in the seven-book series.  The final book will be turned into two movies, which is probably appropriate considering the amount of ground which is covered.  I suspect the filmmakers realized that interest in the films would burn out if several of the later ones were split out in such a way, despite there being no shortage of material to put to the screen.  With the recent films in particular I have really noticed the impact of my lack of background from not having read the books.  The first film struck me as being quite long, and packed full, and just barely covering the material from the fairly thin book.  Each later entry has had to dump at least a couple of hundred pages’ worth of the story by the wayside, making for films which seem to barely scratch the surface of character development and plot complexity.  This latest film was nominated for an Oscar for Cinematography, which is why I saw it.  It didn’t win.

The focus here is on exposing some additional background on how Voldemort came to be, with a good deal of time also devoted to the budding romances among these teenagers.  I was struck even more than usual by the sense that so much about their world is more cut and dried than people would like to admit – can’t we just say out loud that Draco Malfoy is bad, and has been bad since his first appearance in the storyline?  Harry seems to know but nobody else will just accept that.  Yet at the same time, I wonder why other things which shouldn’t be so easily accepted are taken at face value – everyone seems to know of the power and allure of dark magic, yet even the most learned scholars know very little about it so it remains a mystery rather than something which is understood and controlled.  Can you tell that fantasy and wizardry aren’t my favourite fictional subjects?  Maybe there should be more spies and international intrigue.  And car chases.

And that’s Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.  Most already know the story if they are seeing the movie.  For those who haven’t read the books, there’s (just barely) enough background given to be able to follow along on the surface.  And if you haven’t been following the story at all up to this point, there’s plenty that will make no sense at all.  That’s fine with me, though, and I’ll probably see the final two films regardless of their awards eligibility.  I’ll be interested in seeing whether the final film gets a bump in Oscar attention, the way the third Lord of the Rings installment capitalized on the build-up from earlier episodes and took home the big prizes.  I don’t think the Harry Potter films have the same technical pedigree or enough cultural momentum at this point in time, but I may be surprised.  Certainly the acting pedigree has been impeccable from the very start, with the series having given regular work to a huge array of the most respected British actors and actresses currently working.  The movies don’t disappoint, but at the same time they are hardly essential viewing.

That’s another Harry Potter entry done.

Nine

February 26, 2010:  Nine

This film, Nine, had a bunch of strikes against it by the time I’d merely seen the poster.  Director Rob Marshall was the man behind Chicago, Best Picture winner for 2002 and the movie I had to accept as an Oscar-winning musical in order to get it out of Hollywood’s system so they could get back to letting real movies win awards.  Penelope Cruz is heavily featured here, and while I can’t quite put my finger on why, I’m most definitely not a fan of hers.  And an ensemble cast of questionable coherence, including none other than the annoying Sophia Loren, made me dread having to see Nine when it got its inevitable Oscar nominations.  It ended up with four – Supporting Actress for Penelope Cruz, an original song, and Art Direction and Costume Design.

The tone and look are similar to Chicago.  The music is OK, and the production design and costumes are impressive enough as per the nominations, although one could easily make the opposite argument and say that the music is uninventive and the sets are just a bunch of scaffolding.  But the story carries some extra level of interest for me, as it centres around a filmmaker, played by two-time Oscar winner Daniel Day-Lewis, a Fellini-esque character who is struggling to make his next film.  The film, as it turns out, has been greenlighted based on the past success of the director and is actively casting and searching for locations, but in fact it hasn’t been written at all.  Nine boils down to being a love letter to the aesthetic of Italian cinema, and I have to respect that.

Of course, when we add Cruz and her usual exotic “overdramatics”, Nicole Kidman spouting a terrible Italian accent, people breaking into song for no reason (which tends to be a real sticking point with me, Grease notwithstanding), and a broadly-drawn wife-mistress conflict subplot, and the movie starts to seem a bit scattered and lose me.  OK, I get it, I know what the movie is about, now let’s get on with it!  I could easily have never seen this movie, and it doesn’t even have the story depth or coherence of a more fully-developed musical such as, I hate to admit it, Chicago.

Even a musical about movies disappoints.