Skip to content

The Way Back

February 7, 2011:  The Way Back

With an Oscar nomination for its makeup, I was compelled to see The Way Back this month, but I wanted to see it anyway.  An interpretation of the true-life story of a group of prisoners of war during the second world war who escaped from a prison camp in Siberia and literally walked thousands of miles to freedom, The Way Back falls a bit into the standard storytelling traps of this kind of movie, but it’s such an awe-inspiring story that it’s hard not to be impressed.

There aren’t a lot of big acting names here other than Ed Harris, who gives an understated performance as the inspirational and pragmatic patriarch of the group.  I don’t know how closely the film sticks to the real story, and I can’t imagine that in reality there were such standard types as the “guy you know is going to die first”, the “guy who remains heartless until a key moment in the journey and then changes”, and the “guy who is too compassionate for his own good but ends up saving the cynic’s life because of it”.  I tend to like this kind of underdog story, and the scope of the journey offers opportunities for hiking set-pieces covering all kinds of terrain and all kinds of weather, from the bleak winter in the forest to the nearly impassable mountains to the endless dry and hot desert.

I can’t quite decide whether this is just a formulaic throwaway movie, or one which is more deep and meaningful.  I don’t think I’ll bother trying to figure it out since I won’t likely see the movie again any time soon, but if this type of film sounds intriguing, go for it.

A good example of its type.

Alice in Wonderland

February 6, 2011:  Alice in Wonderland

The combination of Disney and Tim Burton seems to result in something tremendous to look at, which doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.  With his usual muses Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter on board, Burton gives us his odd take on the Lewis Carroll story, a warped interpretation of Wonderland and its inhabitants, with a story driven by a strong and simple moral.  I wouldn’t have bothered with this if not for the Oscar nominations for art direction, costumes, and visual effects, and I can’t say that I feel that viewing this film was time well spent.

At first, I wasn’t even convinced that the visual effects were even all that great, with the strange physics accompanying Alice’s fall down the rabbit hole, but the effects improved significantly after that and were well worth the nomination, with live-action and CGI elements mixed together throughout the film.  The costumes represent a typical Burton-esque take on Carter’s Red Queen and her minions as well as Anne Hathaway’s creepy and perhaps miscast White Queen.  The weird cast of supporting characters includes Alan Rickman and Crispin Glover in appropriate roles, but their tone only added to my wondering what the intended audience was for the film.  It didn’t seem to be geared towards kids, but at the same time it wasn’t oriented to the adult perspective either.  This was OK entertainment but I really didn’t care.

Throwaway entry with artistic Oscar nominations.

Salt

February 4, 2011:  Salt

I had considered watching Salt but might not have bothered immediately if not for the Oscar nomination for Sound Mixing.  Angelina Jolie seems to be starring in ever more unlikely thrillers and actioners, and Salt pushes the boundaries of plausibility far past anything the viewer can reasonably be expected to forgive, but I found that it had a certain gleefully irresponsible charm, as if it deliberately went so far beyond real-life believability that it could confidently revel in its own manufactured reality.

Angelina Jolie and Liev Schreiber play two CIA agents who have been devoted to their jobs and their country for many years.  Out of nowhere, a man comes in and claims that Jolie is in fact a Russian spy, at which point she goes rogue and tries to prove her innocence and save the life of her husband, who she believes to be in danger.  This is one of those movies where almost every character is either all good or all bad, but there’s plenty of misdirection along the way to keep us guessing about which ones are which.  I guessed a major twist about 13 minutes into the movie, though admittedly that didn’t make the whole movie entirely predictable, since Jolie’s character remained impossible to interpret until near the end.  However, it’s all still pretty standard stuff.

But I’m a total sucker for action thrillers with super-spies, so I was totally in my element.  There’s just something about individuals being able to escape from full squadrons of police and special forces staff, while at the same time destroying half of a major city, that appeals to me, and I must not be the only one.  Jolie jumps off bridges onto semi-trucks, she escapes dozens of people shooting at her in broad daylight, she jumps her way down an elevator shaft, she steals stuff from anywhere and everywhere all the time, and she MacGyvers together bombs and other weapons in minutes while under hot pursuit.  It’s completely impossible, and yet I love to believe that it could be.

Salt is ridiculous action filmmaking gone wild, and I loved every minute of it, even though I know it’s total crap.  So sue me.

Audiences love spies who can escape.

Unstoppable

February 2, 2011:  Unstoppable

I watched Unstoppable, technically, because of its Oscar nomination for Sound Editing, but I was interested in seeing it before that nomination forced my hand.  On the surface it was likely to be simply another hyperactive and overwrought Tony Scott action film, but it reviewed well during its theatrical run and did fairly well at the box office.  The film, extremely loosely based on real events, is about an out of control train running through urban areas and the courageous actions which brought it to a halt.  I wouldn’t call this a great film by any measure, but it was entertaining and it was loud, and that’s what I was looking for.

The stage is set with the standard character setups, with union-based tension between the old-time freight train conductors who are being laid off to make way for younger and cheaper newcomers.  Denzel Washington is one of the grizzled veterans and Chris Pine is a young fellow who seems to have come into the profession by way of inside connections and intergenerational family guilt.  Washington, unlike the other long-time employees, gives Pine the benefit of the doubt, which turns out to be a good thing since the two of them are then paired up to drive a train together on that fateful day.  Lazy rule-breaking in the freight yard leads to a train with no driver accelerating along a heavily used track between busy cities, and as it gains speed and a few close calls are avoided, the administration tries to decide how to handle this uncontrolled and unstoppable train, which of course happens to be carrying hazardous chemicals as part of its load.

All of the standard players are here.  There’s the bureaucrat who’s so far removed from the reality of driving trains that he decides not to derail the train in a safe area because of the potential loss of money.  There’s the plucky female dispatch operator, played here by the always wonderful Rosario Dawson, who knows the right decisions and pushes for them to be made, but is powerless to enact them unless she puts her own job at risk.  There’s the egghead regulator guy who happens to be visiting the dispatch office that day for an inspection, and he has thoughts about how to stop the train but nobody listens to him because he’s only talking theory and hasn’t done the dirty work of actually driving trains (I’ll give you one guess as to whether or not his suggestions turn out to be right).  There’s the train full of schoolchildren learning about how great rail travel is, who miss being plowed down by the unstoppable train by a margin of about 4 feet.  There’s the recently-estranged wife of Chris Pine, who has a restraining order against him but gets caught up in the drama of his heroics and is right there waiting for him when he emerges successfully from stopping the renegade train.  Unstoppable is “inspired by true events”, not even “based” on them, and it’s easy to see that some artistic license has been taken here.

Still, this is an engaging action premise about men and their big toys, with a freight train doing a side wheelie as it goes too fast around a critical bend on an elevated track in the middle of a city, and the heavy bass rumbling as trains attach to one another and rumble down the track is exactly what Tony Scott is known for bringing to life.  My only serious problem with the film is that the impression of speed is not really achieved.  I know that obviously the real movie trains aren’t travelling as fast as they purportedly are in the story, but usually fast and careful editing can fix that, and I’m surprised that it didn’t.  I could also have done without the silly sentimentality at the end, but it’s inescapable in a movie like this, so I have to let it go.  Unstoppable is good popcorn entertainment, nothing too high-brow, and pretty much delivers on what it promises.

Just prototypical modern-day Tony Scott fare.

Groundhog Day

February 2, 2011:  Groundhog Day

With a snow day declared in Toronto and the whole family home for the day on February 2, was there really any option other than to watch Groundhog Day?  This 1993 Harold Ramis film depicts Bill Murray re-living the same day over and over again, without any idea of what will break the curse of his existence stuck in small-town Pennsylvania on the day when the famous groundhog Punxsutawney Phil comes out to predict the weather.  The film is a comedy first and foremost, but it raises some serious questions about the meaning of life, what to do with the possibilities opened up by endless amounts of available time, how endless repetition and hopelessness can drag a person down, and the limitations of how much you can change people’s long-held perceptions of you in just a single day.

I’ve always loved the concept behind this film, since there’s such potential in it, and I think the movie does a convincing job of taking us through the roller coaster of emotions and reactions to being stuck in a situation where the same day is repeated again and again. There is the initial shock and bafflement, panic when wondering whether or not this is real, eventual glee when realizing that there are no consequences for any actions at all, boredom and depression after realizing that you’re stuck, a renewed interest in the finer things in life after realizing that there’s time to appreciate them, and the eventual settling on a goal which ends up turning out to be the way to break the spell.  Bill Murray is a long-underappreciated dramatic actor who was buried for years under his own curse of being typecast mostly in goofy comedies, and it’s been good to see him steer towards more weighty work over the past decade.  Here, he delivers a performance which requires not only the sarcastic wit for which he’s well known, but also the ability to show a full range of emotions as he goes through every imaginable human triumph and defeat.

How many decades did Murray spend reliving the same day every single day?  It’s unknown, but it’s clear that it was many years.  As a viewer, I don’t remember the first time I saw this film, so in my memory there hasn’t been a time when I didn’t know what needed to happen in order to break the pattern.  It’s an important point, though, since the unknown nature of his problem is key to the emotional journey.  Still, there’s plenty here for the repeat viewer, and we can take a certain joy from the knowledge that Murray’s life will eventually come around to being full and rich, and that he will live a certain February 2nd as many times as it takes before that happens.  This is thoughtful and intelligent comedy which doesn’t need to rely on gross-out gags or coarseness for its laughs, and there’s always a place for that in cinema.

Underappreciated classic comedy about life’s meaning.

The Fighter

February 1, 2011:  The Fighter

How do you know when or whether someone has recovered and is ready to be trusted again?  With some people, there’s a question of whether they can or will ever again be worth taking a chance on.  The Fighter, based on a true-life story, illustrates how families wrestle with that painful dilemma all the time.

Dicky is a former boxer who nearly had a shot at the title, but missed because he didn’t quite have what it takes.  His younger brother Micky is now close to getting his shot, but his family and particularly Dicky may screw it up.  When it comes to family, even in the face of obvious evidence that they aren’t looking out for you, it’s really hard to decide not to stick with them.  After a disastrous Las Vegas fight which they should have turned down because of a substitute opponent, Micky is facing his options and having a hard time deciding what to do.  He eventually goes out on his own, and at the same time Dicky’s drug use catches up with him and he spends some time in jail.  When Dicky gets out the circumstances are different but it’s hard for them both to adjust, especially when this goes against everything they’ve known for decades.  Dicky is an unmatched instinctive fighter, and Micky needs him in his corner in order to succeed, but Dicky has blown so many chances with so many people that they can’t accept him for who he now is.

The Fighter doesn’t deviate far from the typical formula of a sports underdog who triumphs over adversity, which is exactly what I expected, but still, it was better than average.  Amy Adams as Micky’s on-again, off-again girlfriend is mostly wasted, despite her Oscar nomination as Best Supporting Actress.  Melissa Leo as the boys’ mother did deservedly win that award, as she completely inhabited the character of the domineering mother who can’t comprehend that one of her children would go against her.  Christian Bale also won the Supporting Actor Oscar, with his energetic performance as the hyperactive but brilliant Dicky.  The Fighter is a quality film, not one I feel any great attachment to, but absolutely worthy of its high consideration during this recent awards season.

Standard story based on real people.

True Grit (2010)

January 31, 2011:  True Grit (2010)

I watched the original True Grit (1969) just before seeing this Coen brothers remake, and then I saw the original again afterwards.  My first viewing of the remake made the original improve in my mind, and the re-watching of the original improved it even more.  This remake has its moments but struck me as noticeably flawed, though I might similarly improve my opinion if I were to also re-visit this one.

Some of the reinterpreted scenes didn’t have the impact of the originals, and Jeff Bridges’ interpretation of Rooster Cogburn seemed at times wrong to me, including his decision to make most of his lines barely intelligible.  Cogburn opens up more easily and quickly this time, talking about his wife and son as they trot along on their horses.  His drunkenness is emphasized more, and notably is played more for laughs than in the original.  It’s clear that the interpretation is solidly comedic, with everyone having a very affected way of speaking which is mostly played for sardonic laughs, but it sometimes seems out of place, or a little too exaggerated, particularly with Josh Brolin.  Apparently this is closer to the original story (from the novel) in that it focuses more on the young girl than on Cogburn, but I’m not sure that it makes much of a difference.

This reinterpretation of True Grit is certainly funny, and it’s more true to the story than the John Wayne original, but I still don’t think I would consider either one of them to be all-time classics.

Coen brothers creativity sometimes baffles me.

Winter’s Bone

January 31, 2011:  Winter’s Bone

There was plenty of buzz about Winter’s Bone as Oscar season approached, although the film was relatively unknown at the time.  A surprise Best Picture nomination among the newly expanded field of 10 has undoubtedly been a boon for this little film, and further nominations for Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor, and Best Adapted Screenplay speak to the core strengths of this film – the writing and the acting.

Jennifer Lawrence delivers a breakout performance as a teenaged girl in the US south who effectively acts as caregiver to her two younger siblings due to her mentally ill mother and absent drug-dealing father.  When she learns that her father has put up the family home as part of his bail for his most recent arrest, and that the house will be forfeited if he fails to show up for court in a week, Ree goes out into the complex social web of the local community to try and find him.  She intends to either get him to go to court or to find proof that he’s dead, the only two outcomes which would let them keep the house.

Ree’s uncle, portrayed by the Oscar nominated John Hawkes, is tough like his brother and knows the code of the land, and brings a steely calmness to his role which I found reminiscent of Sam Elliott 20 years ago.  In this often forgotten part of rural America, everyone is related to everyone else, and that brings a certain code of honour to everything that people do.  They get out of line from time to time, but they know the price they have to pay if they do.  The uncle warns Ree to stay out of this, but of course she doesn’t listen and gets herself into trouble.  However, this isn’t like it is in a thousand movies you’ve seen before.  She knows full well that she’s walking into trouble, but she knows it’s what she has to do in order to play her part in the drama of life.  Despite their low social position and even through all this trouble, she insists on teaching her siblings both academic and life skills and emphasizes manners in order to help them improve their station in life.  Crucially, she too follows the code and never tells anyone’s secrets to anyone else, and people recognize and respect that and it’s what keeps her alive and moving forward.  When Ree finds out the truth about where her father is, she does what she has to do in order to set things straight, and it’s just about the most horrific experience you can imagine.

I don’t like to fall back on genderalizations in my reviews, since it’s a typical cheap movie review trick, but I think there are times when it’s relevant.  Winter’s Bone is directed by a woman, and in segments of society like the one portrayed here, there is still very much a traditional divide between what a man is expected to do and what a woman is expected to do.  Far from the politically correct cosmopolitan society of today, in the rural south the women are still forced to bear the weight of the conflict put on families, and they tolerate and work within the inescapable male code of honour.  In the brilliant final scene of the film, Ree sees her uncle come to a sudden realization, and pleads with her eyes for him not to go and do what he has to do, but she knows that her pleading will be fruitless.  She can’t cry out or react because the younger kids are right there, but she wishes just this once that the cycle could be broken and families could survive instead of fight.  The cold, brown, late fall setting of the film reflects the sentiment of this bleak and difficult film which captures the bleak and difficult lives of people who live in their own society in a county which barely acknowledges that they exist.

What they say with their eyes.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1

January 26, 2011:  Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1

Following my viewing of the first Harry Potter film out of interest in the storyline, since then I’ve typically only seen them when Oscar nominations force me to do so.  Art Direction and Visual Effects this year led me to see Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1.

Having read the first book but none of the later ones, the plot of these stories has moved far beyond what can be conveyed in even a relatively long film.  I’ve seen the Death Eater characters several times now but the movies have never bothered to explain exactly what they are.  As the books have swelled, the films have been reduced to covering the absolute plot basics and a handful of the tense battles.  I expect it’s a wise and necessary move to split this final book into two films, despite the cynical suggestions of moviegoers that the filmmakers are simply trying to milk the series for all it’s worth.  Despite the quieter and more introspective pace of this film compared with the others, the story is still proceeding at a breakneck pace and clearly not geting into enough detail for the unfamiliar viewer to figure out what the hell is going on.  I find myself not particularly interested in the characters or their fates, and a lot of the allegiances and absolutes in this universe strike me as more and more unlikely with each entry.  This is a complex story and I certainly don’t wish to detract at all from the books and their mythic scale, but the movies really are not well suited to anyone who hasn’t read the books.

Speaking of unfamiliarity with the story, the ending of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 reminded me of the first time I saw Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.  I had not planned to let Tolkien’s legendary stories be entirely ruined by the films but I felt that the first film would be a good primer for me to understand the setting, so I saw the first film before reading the first book, then read the successive books prior to seeing each of their film adaptations.  Going back to the first film, imagine my surprise when at the end, with this motley crew having run off to throw a ring into a fiery mountain, the credits rolled when they reached the top of some random hill and I had to wait another year to see what would happen next.  So it was with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 as Voldemort triumphantly held up a wand he had sought to acquire, and up came the credits.  I guess I’ll find out later this year how the story ends.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 again brings together some of the top British acting talent working today, along with the three core stars who have grown nicely into their roles, and gives us the most superficial possible treatment of a story which has captured the hearts of millions.  But the visual effects and art direction are noteworthy.

I guess they can’t stop now.

Tangled

January 26, 2011:  Tangled

I saw Tangled because of its single Oscar nomination for Best Original Song.  It had reviewed OK so I wasn’t dreading the experience, so I trotted off to the nearest multiplex to see it in 3D.  It turns out to be totally formulaic but well enough done to stand with the typical Disney pedigree.

I was skeptical after a pandering introductory sequence which explained the whole back story and what we were supposed to think about it, which struck me as a overly spoon-fed even for a kid’s movie like this.  In this telling of the Rapunzel story, a young girl is kept captive up in a tower by a woman claiming to be her mother, when in reality she is a kidnapped princess, taken shortly after birth in order to pass along her gift of eternal life to her selfish and vain captor.  She is discovered and saved by a Prince Charming type, and returned to the life she was meant to live.

Of course, we need to throw in some conflict along the journey home, including a run-in with some gruff individuals in a tavern who turn out to be not quite so rough when someone lends a sympathetic ear, and a horse who behaves like a dog and tries to track down Prince Charming who also happens to be a thief.  There is as always a goofy and supportive pet, in this case a chameleon.  The princess has ridiculously insanely huge glowing eyes.  Everyone breaks into song when it suits them.  Generally, it’s the standard Disney animated film template.  For a brief moment I thought they might chop out the invetitable conflict and just end the movie, but no dice.

All of this sounds like I’m kind of getting down on the movie, and it really wasn’t that bad.  It’s just that it didn’t really stand out in any way.  The 3D was OK but probably unnecessary, the story didn’t vary from exactly what we knew would happen, and the characters are cookie-cutter players from countless other similar Disney films.  Tangled was fine, but I didn’t feel that my afternoon had been used to its fullest potential.

Disney animated template fare for kids.